Homology Theory
Level: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
MSC Classification: 55 (Algebraic topology)

Prerequisites:

Getting Oriented

Homology…

The Basics

Homology Groups

Suppose we are given abelian groups Cn for n≥0 (called chain groups) and homomorphisms \partial_n : C_n\to C_{n-1} (called boundary homomorphisms) such that ∂n◦∂n+1=0 for all n≥0. This situation can be represented by the collection of maps

(1)
\cdots \to C_n \overset{\partial_n}{\to} C_{n-1}\to\cdots\to C_1 \overset{\partial_1}{\to} C_0 \overset{\partial_0}{\to} 0,

which is called a chain complex. The condition ∂n◦∂n+1=0 implies that \mathrm{Im}\:\partial_{n+1} < \mathrm{Ker}\:\partial_n, and the abelian group condition implies further that \mathrm{Im}\:\partial_{n+1} is a normal subgroup of \mathrm{Ker}\:\partial_n. Therefore, one may define the quotient of these groups.

Definition

Given a chain complex, the nth homology group is the quotient group H_n=\mathrm{Ker}\:\partial_n \big/ \mathrm{Im}\:\partial_{n+1}. The elements of the group are called homology classes, and two elements of the same class are said to be homologous.

Elements of the kernel \mathrm{Ker}\:\partial_n are called cycles, and elements of the image \mathrm{Im}\:\partial_{n+1} are called boundaries.

Simplicial Homology

In simplicial homology, the chain groups are made up of combinatorial simplices. An n-simplex is a collection of n vertices [v_0,\ldots,v_n]. To handle orientation properly, we assume the list is ordered. Two lists of the same vertices have the same orientation if they are related by an even permutation. By taking finite formal sums of these n-chains, one obtains an abelian group, usually denoted \Delta_n. Negative elements represent those with reversed orientation. Thus, [v_0,v_1] = - [v_1,v_0], since they represent the same 1-simplex but with opposite orientations.

The boundary homomorphism is defined using the orientations. The first few cases are given here as examples:

  • \partial_1[v_0,v_1] = [v_1] - [v_0]
  • \partial_2[v_0,v_1,v_2] = [v_0,v_1] + [v_1,v_2] + [v_2,v_0] = [v_0,v_1] + [v_1,v_2] - [v_0,v_2].

In general, the boundary map \partial_n:\Delta_n\to\Delta_{n-1} is defined as follows:

(2)
\partial_n [v_0,v_1,\ldots,v_n] = \sum_{i=0}^n (-1)^i [v_0,\ldots,\hat v_i,\ldots, v_n],

where \hat v_i indicates that the ith vertex is omitted in that summand. The signs guarantee that ∂n◦∂n+1=0.

Examples

A chain complex is a collection of combinatorial simplices over a common set of vertices. For example, we might consider the complex over vertices v_0,v_1,v_2 containing only the 1-simplices (or edges) [v_0,v_1], [v_1,v_2], [v_0,v_2]. Here is the calculation of homology groups:

  • Since there are no simplices of dimension greater than 1, Cn=0 for n≥2. The chain map reduces to 0\to\Delta_1\to\Delta_0\to0.
  • It is clear that \mathrm{Im}\:\partial_2=0 and \mathrm{Ker}\:\partial_0=\Delta_0.
  • For the remaining boundary map, \mathrm{Im}\:\partial_1 = \langle [v_1]-[v_0], [v_2]-[v_1], [v_0]-[v_2] \rangle, which is to say it is generated by the images of the three edges. So the 0th homology group is generated by \mathrm{Ker}\:\partial_0=\Delta_0=\langle [v_0], [v_1], [v_2] \rangle, with relations arising from \mathrm{Im}\:\partial_1 that state [v_0]=[v_1]=[v_2]. A single generator suffices, and so H_0\cong\mathbb{Z}.
  • \mathrm{Ker}\:\partial_1 = \langle[v_0,v_1]+[v_1,v_2]+[v_2,v_0]\rangle, and so H_1\cong\mathbb{Z} also. It is generated by this single cycle.

Singular Homology

OLD MATERIAL… NEEDS UPDATING…

Singular theory deals with maps from simplices into a space. Let E_0, \ldots, E_q be the standard unit vectors in \mathbb{R}^q. Then, the standard q-simplex, denoted by \Delta_q, is the simplex spanned by E_0, \ldots, E_q. A singular q-simplex in X is a map \Delta_q \to X. A singular q-chain is the formal sum of singular q-simplices. The set of singular q-chains is denoted S_q(X).

We let (P_0 \cdots P_q) denote the unique affine map \mathbb{R}^q \to X taking E_0 into P_0, \ldots, E_q \to P_q. The identity map of \Delta_q is \delta_q=(E_0 \cdots E_q). The i-th face \sigma^(i) of a q-simplex \sigma is the singular (q-1)-simplex \sigma \circ F_q^i, where F_q^i: \Delta_{q-1} \to \Delta_q is given by F_q^i=(E_0 \cdots \widehat{E_i} \cdots E_q) (the E_i being omitted). Thus, if \sigma = (P_0 \cdots P_q), then \sigma^(i) = (P_0 \cdots \widehat{P_i} \cdots P_q).

The boundary of a singular q-simplex \sigma is the (q-1)-chain \partial(\sigma)=\sum_{i=0}^q (-1)^i \sigma^{(i)}. Note that \partial \partial = 0. A cycle is a singular q-chain c with \partial(c)=0. The module of cycles is denoted by Z_q. A boundary is a singular q-chain c with c=\partial(c') for some (q+1)-chain c'. All boundaries are cycles. The submodule of the cycle module Z_q consisting of boundaries is denoted by B_q.

Two q-chains c_1, c_2, are said to be homologous (written c_1 \sim c_2) if c_1 - c_2 = \partial(c') for some (q+1)-chain c'. The q-th singular homology module of X, denoted by H_q(X;R), or simply H_q(X), is the quotient module Z_q/B_q. Because homologous elements of S_q(X) differ by a boundary, the “zero” element in H_q(X), they represent the same element in H_q(X). The first homology module, H_0(X), is a free \mathbb{R}-module on as many generators as there are path components of X.

The reduced 0-th homology module H_0^\#(X) is obtained by defining the boundary \partial^\#:S_0(X) \to \mathbb{R} by \partial^\#(\sum_x \nu_x x) = \sum_x \nu_x. Then, we let \partial^\# \partial = 0 and H_0^\#(X) = \ker \partial^\# / \mathrm{im} \partial_1. Thus, if X is path connected, then H_0^\#(X)=0. The reduced homology is defined by letting H_q^\#(X)=H_q(X) for q>0.

We can now consider maps between various spaces, say X and X'. We expect that if these maps are well-behaved, they should not change the homology properties. Given a map f:X \to X', we obtain a homomorphism S_q(f):S_q(X) \to S_q(X') by letting S_q(f)(\sum\nu_\sigma \sigma) = \sum\nu_\sigma(f \circ \sigma), as one would expect. Moreover, \partial commutes with these homomorphisms: \partial S_q(f) = S_{q-1}(f) \partial. We can also define a homomorphism between the homology modules by H_q(f)(\bar z) = \overline{S_q(f)(z)}, where z is a q-cycle on X, and \bar z its homology class. This demonstrates that homology modules are topological invariants.

…discussion of naturality

Going Further

The Road Ahead

References

  • Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology
page_revision: 7, last_edited: 1254929504|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z (%O ago)
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License